· · ·

F/A-XX: Boeing Wins the Navy’s Next Carrier Fighter

Boeing beat Northrop Grumman for the Navy’s F/A-XX carrier fighter, a $20B-plus development deal. What is known, what is classified and the risks ahead.

Navy Super Hornet with afterburners lit launching from a carrier deck over blue ocean, more jets parked at right
An F/A-18E Super Hornet, the jet F/A-XX is meant to replace, launches from USS Nimitz (CVN 68) in the Pacific Ocean on 25 April 2013. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Chris Bartlett (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. Navy has picked Boeing to build its first sixth-generation fighter. The Department of War announced the award of a contract for the F/A-XX strike fighter, valued at more than $20 billion for the full-scale development phase. Boeing beat Northrop Grumman, the other finalist, Breaking Defense reported.

The decision ends more than a year of delay over whether the Pentagon could fund, and industry could build, two new crewed fighters at once. It also leaves one company developing both of America’s sixth-generation fighters.

What is on the record

Boeing said in its own release that “technical and programmatic details of F/A-XX remain classified under U.S. national security and export laws.” The table gathers what has been said publicly.

ItemWhat officials have saidSource
Prime contractorBoeing; Northrop Grumman lost the final roundDepartment of War, Breaking Defense
Contract scopeFull-scale development, including “multiple test aircraft for ground, airworthiness, systems, and weapons integration testing”Department of War
Jets replacedF/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler, beginning in the 2030s; will fly alongside the F-35CDepartment of War
Range goal“Probably over 125 percent of the range that we’re seeing today,” before aerial refuelingRear Adm. Michael Donnelly, April 2025, via TWZ
Drone teamingBuilt to work with Collaborative Combat Aircraft and other crewed and uncrewed platformsDepartment of War
FundingNearly $1.7 billion in fiscal 2026, most of it added by Congress; $140 million requested for fiscal 2027Budget documents via DefenseScoop
First flight, fleet size, unit costNot announcedNone published

*Table compiled by Peter’s World from the sources linked in each row. The jet it replaces, the Super Hornet, entered fleet service in 1999, according to the Navy’s fact file.*

What the Navy is buying

“F/A-XX will dominate contested airspace, extend operational reach, and deliver a decisive combat advantage for the warfighter,” said Michael P. Duffey, the under secretary of war for acquisition and sustainment. Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao called it “a generational leap in air superiority.”

Range is the core of the Navy’s argument. The F-35C has the longest combat radius in today’s carrier air wing, about 670 nautical miles according to U.S. military sources cited by TWZ; the outlet calculated that the Navy’s goal would put F/A-XX near 840 nautical miles. Donnelly said the jet is being designed around refueling from the MQ-25 Stingray tanker drone.

Navy officials have repeatedly said F/A-XX will have its own airframe, separate from the F-47, Breaking Defense reported. TWZ noted similarities between Boeing’s F/A-XX rendering and official F-47 images, but neither the department nor Boeing has said how closely the two designs are related.

A program that nearly stalled

Key dates in the fight between the Pentagon, the White House, the Navy and Congress, compiled by Peter’s World from the sources below:

  • March 2025: Boeing wins the Air Force’s F-47. Lockheed Martin is reportedly eliminated from the F/A-XX competition the same month (TWZ).
  • June 2025: The Pentagon’s fiscal 2026 request seeks only $74 million for F/A-XX, putting priority on the F-47 (DefenseScoop).
  • July 2025: The White House warns Congress that funding F/A-XX could delay the F-47 (Breaking Defense). The Navy asks for $1.4 billion on its unfunded priorities list (DefenseScoop).
  • January 2026: The House-Senate compromise fiscal 2026 defense appropriations bill provides $972 million in research money and directs a single-vendor development award.
  • April 2026: Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle says a selection will come in August, adding that the Navy took a “check twice, cut once” approach (DefenseScoop).
  • August 2026: The deadline passes without an announcement (TWZ).
  • 29 September 2026: The award is announced. The same day, the Navy also awards Boeing a contract to support shutting down Super Hornet and Growler production (Breaking Defense).

Caudle has tied the need to threats the Navy faces now. “Our ability to fly with impunity with our existing airframes is fleeting,” he said in January, weeks before major U.S. combat operations against Iran began. TWZ has since reported that U.S. crewed and uncrewed aircraft have been lost to Iranian air defenses.

Can Boeing build two new fighters at once?

Boeing says yes. “Delivering two advanced fighters in parallel was always our plan, and we invested accordingly,” said Steve Parker, chief executive of Boeing Defense, Space & Security. The company says it is building a secure manufacturing facility in St. Louis that it describes as the largest in the United States.

Analysts who spoke to Breaking Defense were less certain. “They will be trying to execute F/A-XX, F-47, T-7, and a significant planned increase in F-15EX rates all at the same time from the same factory complex,” said Jeremiah Gertler of AeroDynamic Advisory, a former Congressional Research Service aviation analyst. Two weeks before the award, Air Force Gen. Dale White, a senior Pentagon acquisition official, repeated industrial-capacity concerns, TWZ reported.

Northrop said it looked forward to receiving more information about the selection. Roman Schweizer of TD Cowen wrote in an investor note that protests of major classified aircraft competitions have historically had a low success rate. No protest had been publicly reported in the coverage Peter’s World reviewed as of 10 October.

Why it matters

Peter’s World analysis, based on the sources cited in this article.

The award settles who will build the Navy’s next fighter, but the biggest questions remain unanswered in public: how many jets the Navy will buy, what each will cost and when the first will fly. With the design classified, outsiders will judge the program mainly by its schedule.

The Navy’s case rests on reach. A carrier that has to sail inside an adversary’s missile range to launch strikes is a carrier at risk, and the service has described F/A-XX as a way to push that launch point farther out. A gain of about a quarter is meaningful but modest, which suggests the Navy is counting on tanker drones and Collaborative Combat Aircraft to supply the rest. In our judgment, that makes the drone programs nearly as important to the carrier’s future as the fighter itself.

The larger risk is industrial. Putting both U.S. sixth-generation fighters with one company in one city may let Boeing share engineering work and suppliers, as analysts have suggested. It also means a labor shortage or quality problem in St. Louis could slow the Air Force and the Navy at the same time. That trade-off, more than the headline contract value, is what Congress is likely to watch.

What to watch: whether Northrop files a protest, the Navy’s planned buy and first-flight date, the fiscal 2027 budget fight over F/A-XX money, and how much the jet shares with the F-47.

Sources

Additional sources

Recommended articles